THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO IMMIGRATION LAW CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system

The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system

Blog Article

However, within an effort to strike a balance between the rights of citizens as well as plans that are executed through the authorities to the welfare, financial progress and prosperity from the place, the Court didn't make a definitive ruling within the pending construction of your grid station, but, with the consent of both parties, ordered a review and report of grid project by the National Engineering Services of Pakistan (NESPAK) to propose alterations and location alternatives.

In accordance with the EPA cost schedule, the request should be limited in scope, and never be intended for redistribution over the internet or for commercial purposes. 

Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may well seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

“Making certain the accuracy of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple reputable sources is essential for reliable legal research.”

Please use 1 username and password set from the options. If it does not work please test the other. Each and every allows single user access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have concluded your session in Manupatra.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may be just one or more judgments offered (or reported). Only the reason with the decision on the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar issue. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to in the state court, for the same level.

Section 302 with the PPC outlines website the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject matter to your most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're from the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion might be viewed as, however, we've been apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, issue to availability of vacancy issue to the approval of the competent authority.

In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only done In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded into the allegations therefore they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion with the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)

13309-B of 2010 to be weak types of evidence and the evidentiary value whereof would be seen with the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, As a result, confirmed custody of the petitioner in jail is not going to serve any useful purpose at this stage.”

competent authority has determined the eligibility on the private respondents and found them to be in shape for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)

Report this page